Tax & Assurance Guidance

New Transfer Pricing Standards Raise the Bar and Widen the Net— Starting at $20 Million in Revenue

Posted on April 27, 2017 by

Clayton & Mckervey

Clayton & McKervey

Share This

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Major trading partners implement stringent new transfer pricing rules

Transfer pricing has long been a tax concern for the largest multinationals and news articles on Apple, Starbucks, Google and others have raised the profile of this contentious tax issue. While the biggest companies (with global revenues greater than $850 million/ €750 million) have the most extensive new regulations, many middle market companies will be subject to the same requirements. Most notably, some companies with global revenues of €100 million, €50 million and even $20 million are now subject to the same higher transfer pricing documentation standards as large multinationals.

New Documentation Rules Require Far More Information on Cross-Border Transactions

New transfer pricing documentation standards require companies to provide information on both global business operations (a “Master File”) available to all tax authorities and a transfer pricing analysis (a “Local File”) for tax authorities in countries where a multinational operates. The parent company tax authority would have access to the Master File and all Local Files.

In Clayton & McKervey’s experience, these new requirements are more prescriptive both in terms of the volume of information required and the details that must be included in a report. For instance, a Master File should include written descriptions of important drivers of business profit, the supply chain for the five largest product lines, major service agreements within the group, and an explanation of which companies own intangibles by country.

By contrast, a Local File for each country, requires a thorough explanation of local business strategies, functions, risks and assets. Each Local File must also include an explanation of intercompany transactions, financial results and selection of the “Best/Most Appropriate Method” for benchmarking transfer prices.

Mid-sized Companies Are No Exception

While new documentation standards have been publicized for the largest multinationals (group revenues greater than $850 million/ €750 million), many countries are also requiring Master Files and Local Files for much smaller companies; some as low as $20 million in global revenues.

As an example, the Netherlands now requires companies with global group revenues of €50 million to prepare Master Files and Local Files to comply with Dutch transfer pricing documentation rules. Therefore, US companies with revenues greater than €50 million and Dutch subsidiaries would be subject to these Master File/Local File standards.

While countries such as the US and Canada do not explicitly have Master File and Local File thresholds for smaller companies, there is a significant increase in recent transfer pricing audit requests. Both the Internal Revenue Service and Canada Revenue Agency are regularly demanding transfer pricing documentation during tax audits, with a growing interest in middle-market companies.

New Transfer Pricing Documentation Thresholds
Country Master File/Local File Documentation Threshold New Development?
Austria
  • €50 million in Group Revenues
Yes
Belgium
  • €50 million in Group Revenues or 100 employees
Yes
Denmark
  • DKK 125 million (~$20 million) in Group Revenues and more than 250 employees
Yes
Germany
  • €100 million of Local German company revenue
Yes
Netherlands
  • €50 million in Group Revenues
Yes
Poland
  • €20 million in Group Revenues for Master File
  • Lower thresholds for Local File, incl. benchmarking studies
Yes
Spain
  • €45 million in Group Revenues
Yes
Sweden
  • SEK 400 million (~$44.3 million) in Group Revenues and more than 250 employees
Yes
Switzerland
  • Thresholds to be announced
Yes
UK
  • Thresholds to be announced
Yes
Australia
  • Modified Local File lodgment for companies with transactions greater than A$2 million
  • Details on transfer pricing methodologies utilized
  • Submission of Intercompany Agreements to the ATO
Yes
Mexico
  • MXP 671 million (~$35.8 million) in Group Revenue for Master File – submitted to government
  • Local documentation still required for companies with Mexican revenues of 13 million MXP (~$US1 million)
Yes
Israel
  • Thresholds to be announced
Yes
China
  • RMB 200 million (~$29 million) of tangible property
  • RMB 40 million (~$5.8 million) for intangible property or services
No
India
  • Thresholds to be announced
  • Documentation standards still apply
Yes
Japan
  • Local File for intercompany transactions greater than 5 billion Yen (~$45.5 million); or
  • Local File for intangible property transactions greater than 300 million Yen (~$2.8 million)
Yes
South Korea
  • KRW 100 billion (~$176 million) in local country revenue and KRW 50 billion (~$88 million) in intercompany transactions
Yes

 

Bottom Line

Multinationals should revisit their transfer pricing documentation approach in light of these more stringent tax authority standards. The Master File/Local File requirements provide greater visibility over a company’s operations to auditors, raising tax risks considerably.

*Please note that this list does not include every country with the new Master File and Local File requirements as of April 2017.

Clayton & McKervey

Related Insights

Tax & Assurance Guidance

Foreign Tax Withholding: What You Need to Know

Posted on April 26, 2022 by

Rob Cheyne
Making service payments to a foreign person is a common cross-border transaction. U.S. taxpayers need to be aware of the applicability of withholding tax and related reporting requirements to ensure they comply and avoid unintended consequences. A U.S. payor must collect withholding tax and remit it to the IRS in the case it is applicable.

Tax & Assurance Guidance

SALT Relief for Partners and S Corps

Posted on February 23, 2022 by

Miroslav Georgiev
With small businesses supporting nearly 47% of U.S. employees, states have been advocating for pass-through entities, operating partnerships and S corporations that have been harshly impacted by the Tax Cuts and Job Act ‘s state and local taxes deduction limit. Recent legislative activity is finally providing relief for many of these businesses. 

Tax & Assurance Guidance

IRS Provides Relief on K-2 and K-3

Posted on February 17, 2022 by

Margaret Amsden
In an attempt to provide more transparency with regard to reporting of foreign activity and/or information to foreign owners, the IRS came out with two new forms: Schedule K-2 (an addendum to the Schedule K) and Schedule K-3 (an addendum to the Schedule K-1). Learn about the latest K-2 and K-3 reporting requirements issued by the IRS.

Sign up for our newsletters

Get general business and industry-specific news and knowledge straight from our accounting specialists.

The Sound of Automation Podcast

The Sound of Automation Podcast

Industrial automation businesses are the driving force behind Industry 4.0, and Clayton & McKervey is here to help.

Insights & Perspectives

Data-driven decision making: 3 key insights for business owners

What does it take to build a data-driven business? For self-reliant leaders who feel they’ve hit a plateau when it comes to scaling a business, adopting a data-driven approach can be a breakthrough success strategy. Using data in a more focused way helps good engineers become good entrepreneurs. It’s about creating balance. Here we take a look at key insights for business owners when using data in decision making.

Read More

The Sound of Automation Podcast

Industrial automation businesses are the driving force behind Industry 4.0, and Clayton & McKervey is here to help.

Skip to content