Tax & Assurance Guidance

Differences between IFRS and GAAP

Posted on August 1, 2012 by

Tim Finerty

Tim Finerty

Share This

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

As globalization spreads, there is a growing need for a universal accounting standard. This is where International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) steps in; founded by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”), IFRS has been adopted in more than 100 countries, but the United States has yet to adopt. From the Norwalk Agreement to IFRS 3, IFRS and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) have come closer to convergence, but even with these fundamental steps, they still have a fair amount of differences.

Revenue recognition is definitely a front runner, and one of several top targets the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and IASB are working on to converge. US GAAP provides a lot of guidance, but no set standard. IFRS requires revenue recognition when the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred and performance has occurred. Right now we are all waiting for the results of the joint project between the IASB and FASB.

Inventory Accounting Methods

Under IFRS, there is no LIFO costing for inventory, lower of cost or net realizable value presentation is required and lower of cost or market adjustments must be reversed under defined conditions.

For property, plant, and equipment under IFRS, impairment is suggested when book value exceeds the greater
of the value in use or the fair value less the cost to sell. Under US GAAP a triggering event has to occur prior to requiring an assessment of the difference between fair value and carrying value. IFRS also calls for revaluation and reversal of revaluation in certain situations. US GAAP never allows for reversal of impairment.

Impairments for Intangible Assets

Except for goodwill, IFRS also allows for the reversal of impairments recognized for intangible assets, and goodwill impairment is assessed similar to the assessment of impairment of intangible assets under US GAAP; in a single step.

Under IFRS current liabilities, contingencies and subsequent events are measured by their best estimate to settle, discounted to present value. One of the most striking differences is that IFRS provides for some recognition of contingent gains, if they are probable of realization.

Under IFRS deferred income taxes are automatically non-current assets or liabilities. There is no “more likely than not” threshold applied for uncertain tax positions, and tax rate changes are recognized when they are” substantially enacted” which is prior to US GAAP recognition. Under US GAAP the classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities follows the source of the asset or liability that resulted in the deferral.

Of course, we have all seen the move to converge to the elimination of operating leases and recognition of the liability and a right to lease. This remains another hot topic of the joint project between the IASB and FASB. The IASB and FASB plan to release a joint exposure draft for public comment in the fourth quarter of 2012.

Tim Finerty

Shareholder

Tim is known for his inclusive & solutions-oriented approach and his ability to easily connect with clients and staff.

Related Insights

Tax & Assurance Guidance

Foreign Tax Withholding: What You Need to Know

Posted on April 26, 2022 by

Rob Cheyne
Making service payments to a foreign person is a common cross-border transaction. U.S. taxpayers need to be aware of the applicability of withholding tax and related reporting requirements to ensure they comply and avoid unintended consequences. A U.S. payor must collect withholding tax and remit it to the IRS in the case it is applicable.

Tax & Assurance Guidance

SALT Relief for Partners and S Corps

Posted on February 23, 2022 by

Miroslav Georgiev
With small businesses supporting nearly 47% of U.S. employees, states have been advocating for pass-through entities, operating partnerships and S corporations that have been harshly impacted by the Tax Cuts and Job Act ‘s state and local taxes deduction limit. Recent legislative activity is finally providing relief for many of these businesses. 

Tax & Assurance Guidance

IRS Provides Relief on K-2 and K-3

Posted on February 17, 2022 by

Margaret Amsden
In an attempt to provide more transparency with regard to reporting of foreign activity and/or information to foreign owners, the IRS came out with two new forms: Schedule K-2 (an addendum to the Schedule K) and Schedule K-3 (an addendum to the Schedule K-1). Learn about the latest K-2 and K-3 reporting requirements issued by the IRS.

Sign up for our newsletters

Get general business and industry-specific news and knowledge straight from our accounting specialists.

The Sound of Automation Podcast

The Sound of Automation Podcast

Industrial automation businesses are the driving force behind Industry 4.0, and Clayton & McKervey is here to help.

Insights & Perspectives

Data-driven decision making: 3 key insights for business owners

What does it take to build a data-driven business? For self-reliant leaders who feel they’ve hit a plateau when it comes to scaling a business, adopting a data-driven approach can be a breakthrough success strategy. Using data in a more focused way helps good engineers become good entrepreneurs. It’s about creating balance. Here we take a look at key insights for business owners when using data in decision making.

Read More

The Sound of Automation Podcast

Industrial automation businesses are the driving force behind Industry 4.0, and Clayton & McKervey is here to help.

Skip to content