• COVID-19
  • Insights
  • Who We Help
    •   Industrial Automation
    •   Manufacturing & Distribution
    •   A&E Professional Services
    •   International Businesses
      • ◦   Expanding Outside the U.S.
      • ◦   Expanding to the U.S.
  • Services
    •   COVID-19
      • ◦   Cash Flow Confidence Assessment
      • ◦   Maximize Your Loan Forgiveness
      • ◦   5 Key Focus Areas
      • ◦   COVID-19 Resource Center
    •   Client Accounting
      • ◦   Software Solutions
      • ◦   Accounting Support
      • ◦   Reporting
    •   Tax
      • ◦   R&D Tax Credit
      • ◦   Tax Credits & Incentives
      • ◦   Tax Structure
      • ◦   Federal Tax
      • ◦   State & Local Tax
      • ◦   Personal Tax
      • ◦   Other Tax Filings
    •   Advisory & Assurance
      • ◦   Audit & Attest
      • ◦   Financial Statements
      • ◦   Employee Benefit Plan Audits
      • ◦   Technical Accounting & Reporting
    •   Consulting
      • ◦   Data Analytics
      • ◦   Transaction Services
      • ◦   Business Planning
      • ◦   Succession & Exit Strategies
    •   International
      • ◦   International Tax
      • ◦   Foreign Direct Investment
      • ◦   Global Expansion
      • ◦   International Accounting
  • Events
  • Careers
    •   Why C&M
    •   Students
      • ◦   Campus Events
      • ◦   Internships
      • ◦   Reach Beyond Program
    •   Experienced Professionals
      • ◦   Team member profile videos
    •   Opportunities
    •   Employee Journals
    •   Office Tour
  • About Us
    •   How We Help
      • ◦   Service Approach
      • ◦   Affiliations
      • ◦   Communications & Technology
    •   Meet Our Team
    •   Testimonials
    •   Our Videos
    •   Our Story
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
CHANGE COUNTRY:
  • United States
  • 中国
  • Client Login
Clayton & McKervey Logo
  • COVID-19
  • Insights
  • Who We Help
  • Services
  • Events
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
    • Most Recent Insights
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. Revenue Recognition – Step 2

Revenue Recognition – Step 2

Posted by Julie Killian on September 8, 2017

Julie Killian Julie Killian

Over the past several months, information has been provided about the new revenue recognition standard released by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The standard replaces the current revenue guidance found in multiple places in the FASB codification, and provides a single comprehensive standard that will apply to nearly all industries, significantly changing how revenue is recognized.

The standard provides a five step process for recognizing revenue, as follows:

  1. Identify the contract with the customer
  2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract
  3. Determine the transaction price for the contract
  4. Allocate the transaction price to each specific performance obligation
  5. Recognize the revenue when the entity satisfies each performance obligation

Step two, identifying the performance obligations in the contract, is a critical step because it impacts both how much revenue will be recognized, as well as when a company can record revenue.  ASU 606 defines a performance obligation as a promise to provide a good or service to a customer. The promise can be explicitly stated, implicit, or assumed based on customary business practices. Understanding all of the promises in a contract is a challenging part of this new guidance. The contract definition is very broad and is not limited to the goods or services clearly described in the contract. The definition encompasses promises implied by other means such as customary business practices, published policies and specific statements through email or other communication. If any of those promises lead to an expectation by the customer that the entity will deliver a good or service, under the new guidelines, it must be honored.

In order to allocate the transaction price to performance obligations the good or service has to be:

  • A distinct good or service or bundle of goods or services, or
  • A series of distinct goods or services that are materially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer

The FASB describes a distinct good or service as one that generates an economic benefit to the customer on its own or together with other readily available resources. A readily available resource would be a good or service that is sold separately or a resource that the customer already has. A good measure of whether a good or service is distinct, is to determine if it can be sold on a standalone basis. Often times there are multiple performance obligations in a contract. These are accounted for on a standalone basis if they are separately identifiable or distinct from other promises in the contract.

A series of distinct goods or services has the same pattern of transfer if each good or service in the series can be considered a performance obligation satisfied over time. The same method is used to measure progress toward completion for each distinct good or service in the series.

Performance obligations are satisfied and revenue can be recognized when a customer obtains control of the asset or benefits from the services provided. Performance obligations are completed and revenue is recognized either at a point in time or over a period of time, depending on certain facts.

  • At a point in time – a company has to go through the criteria to determine if a performance obligation is satisfied over time. If it does not meet those criteria, then the performance obligation is satisfied and revenue recognized at the point in time when control of the good or service is transferred to the customer.
  • Over a period of time – a performance obligation is satisfied and revenue is recognized over time if any one of the following are met:
    • The customer receives and consumes the benefits of the goods or services as they are provided by the entity (routine, recurring services like a cleaning service are an example of a series of services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer)
    • The goods or services create or enhance an asset that the customer controls as that asset is created or enhanced (this would be common for contractors who may renovate a home owned by the customer, or build a structure on land owned by the customer)
    • The asset created does not have an alternative use to the entity and the entity has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date (some examples are custom design services, or construction of a custom product to customer specifications). An enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date should include the right to costs incurred to date and a reasonable profit margin.

When a performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time, it is similar to what is known in the current revenue recognition literature as percentage of completion. The primary difference is that the revenue is intended to be recognized in a pattern that represents the transfer of control to the customer. The standard provides two acceptable methods of measuring progress:

  • Output method – Revenue is recognized based on the value transferred to the customer relative to the remaining value to be transferred. Some examples would be, surveys of performance completed to date, appraisals of results, milestone reached, time elapsed and units produced.
  • Input method – Revenue is recognized based on the entity’s effort to satisfy the performance obligation, relative to the total expected effort to satisfy the performance obligation. Some examples are, resources consumed, labor hours expended, costs incurred, time elapsed and machine hours used. The input method has to carefully consider if the inputs truly measure progress to completion. For example, materials may be purchased and recorded as inputs to the project, but due to uninstalled materials or inefficiencies resulting in wasted material, the full amount may not properly depict progress.

Once the performance obligations have been identified, then it is time to move to Step 3: Determining the transaction price.

Our team is always ready to help.

Please contact us for more information.

Julie Killian

Julie Killian

Shareholder, Advisory & Assurance

Contact Julie   |   Read Julie's bio

related news

Financial Management: 4 Key Technology Transformations

The accounting industry looks a lot different these days than it did 10 years ago. From shifts towards data-driven strategy to the implementation of new technological tools, the profession has…

Read full story

5 Financial Considerations for Architecture and Engineering Firms

Working with walls, light, shadow and the properties of a nearly endless array of building materials, architects and engineers create the spaces in which we live and work. Some are…

Read full story

How to Increase Tax Savings with a Roth IRA-Owned IC-DISC

Did You Know Combining these Strategies Can Help You Save Even More Tax Dollars? Many business owners may already be aware of the very popular tax saving strategies that exist…

Read full story

Family-Owned Businesses: Succession Planning

In this episode of The Sound of Automation podcast, Frank Lashier III, COO of Dominion Technologies Group, Inc. joins us to talk about the challenges of transitioning a business within a…

Read full story

Clayton & McKervey Announces Appointment as Key Global Partner for the Centuro Global Network

Media Contact: Denise Asker, dasker@claytonmckervey.com; 248.936.9488 Southfield, Mich.—April 5, 2021—Clayton & McKervey, a certified public accounting and business advisory firm helping growth-driven companies compete in the global marketplace, is pleased…

Read full story

Stay Connected

Here are some additional ways to stay connected.

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • View upcoming events
  • Contact us to learn more

Categories

Jump directly to the topics that matter to you most.

  • A&E Professional Services
  • About Us
  • Advisory & Assurance
  • Business Owners
  • Careers
  • Client Accounting Services
  • Consulting
  • COVID-19
  • Data Analytics
  • From the President
  • Industrial Automation
  • International
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
  • Podcasts
  • Press Releases
  • Private Client Services
  • Tax & Tax Credits
  • Transaction Services
  • Videos
    • Ben Smith
    • Beth Butchart
    • Bryan Powrozek
    • Carlos Calderon
    • Casey Haggerty
    • Clayton & McKervey
    • Dave Van Damme
    • Denise Asker
    • Eric Lin
    • Jim Biehl
    • Julie Killian
    • Kevin Johns
    • Margaret Amsden
    • Miroslav Georgiev
    • Nina Wang
    • Rob Dutkiewicz
    • Ruben Ramirez
    • Sarah Russell
    • Sue Tuson
    • Tarah Ablett
    • Teresa Gordon
    • Tim Finerty
    • Tim Hilligoss
  • Main Content
  • Related Insights

Revenue Recognition – Step 2

Posted by Julie Killian on September 8, 2017

Julie Killian

Over the past several months, information has been provided about the new revenue recognition standard released by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The standard replaces the current revenue guidance found in multiple places in the FASB codification, and provides a single comprehensive standard that will apply to nearly all industries, significantly changing how revenue is recognized.

The standard provides a five step process for recognizing revenue, as follows:

  1. Identify the contract with the customer
  2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract
  3. Determine the transaction price for the contract
  4. Allocate the transaction price to each specific performance obligation
  5. Recognize the revenue when the entity satisfies each performance obligation

Step two, identifying the performance obligations in the contract, is a critical step because it impacts both how much revenue will be recognized, as well as when a company can record revenue.  ASU 606 defines a performance obligation as a promise to provide a good or service to a customer. The promise can be explicitly stated, implicit, or assumed based on customary business practices. Understanding all of the promises in a contract is a challenging part of this new guidance. The contract definition is very broad and is not limited to the goods or services clearly described in the contract. The definition encompasses promises implied by other means such as customary business practices, published policies and specific statements through email or other communication. If any of those promises lead to an expectation by the customer that the entity will deliver a good or service, under the new guidelines, it must be honored.

In order to allocate the transaction price to performance obligations the good or service has to be:

  • A distinct good or service or bundle of goods or services, or
  • A series of distinct goods or services that are materially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the customer

The FASB describes a distinct good or service as one that generates an economic benefit to the customer on its own or together with other readily available resources. A readily available resource would be a good or service that is sold separately or a resource that the customer already has. A good measure of whether a good or service is distinct, is to determine if it can be sold on a standalone basis. Often times there are multiple performance obligations in a contract. These are accounted for on a standalone basis if they are separately identifiable or distinct from other promises in the contract.

A series of distinct goods or services has the same pattern of transfer if each good or service in the series can be considered a performance obligation satisfied over time. The same method is used to measure progress toward completion for each distinct good or service in the series.

Performance obligations are satisfied and revenue can be recognized when a customer obtains control of the asset or benefits from the services provided. Performance obligations are completed and revenue is recognized either at a point in time or over a period of time, depending on certain facts.

  • At a point in time – a company has to go through the criteria to determine if a performance obligation is satisfied over time. If it does not meet those criteria, then the performance obligation is satisfied and revenue recognized at the point in time when control of the good or service is transferred to the customer.
  • Over a period of time – a performance obligation is satisfied and revenue is recognized over time if any one of the following are met:
    • The customer receives and consumes the benefits of the goods or services as they are provided by the entity (routine, recurring services like a cleaning service are an example of a series of services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer)
    • The goods or services create or enhance an asset that the customer controls as that asset is created or enhanced (this would be common for contractors who may renovate a home owned by the customer, or build a structure on land owned by the customer)
    • The asset created does not have an alternative use to the entity and the entity has an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date (some examples are custom design services, or construction of a custom product to customer specifications). An enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date should include the right to costs incurred to date and a reasonable profit margin.

When a performance obligation and revenue is recognized over time, it is similar to what is known in the current revenue recognition literature as percentage of completion. The primary difference is that the revenue is intended to be recognized in a pattern that represents the transfer of control to the customer. The standard provides two acceptable methods of measuring progress:

  • Output method – Revenue is recognized based on the value transferred to the customer relative to the remaining value to be transferred. Some examples would be, surveys of performance completed to date, appraisals of results, milestone reached, time elapsed and units produced.
  • Input method – Revenue is recognized based on the entity’s effort to satisfy the performance obligation, relative to the total expected effort to satisfy the performance obligation. Some examples are, resources consumed, labor hours expended, costs incurred, time elapsed and machine hours used. The input method has to carefully consider if the inputs truly measure progress to completion. For example, materials may be purchased and recorded as inputs to the project, but due to uninstalled materials or inefficiencies resulting in wasted material, the full amount may not properly depict progress.

Once the performance obligations have been identified, then it is time to move to Step 3: Determining the transaction price.

Our team is always ready to help.

Please contact us for more information.

Julie Killian

Shareholder, Advisory & Assurance

Contact Julie   |   Read Julie's bio

related news

Financial Management: 4 Key Technology Transformations

The accounting industry looks a lot different these days than it did 10 years ago. From shifts towards data-driven strategy to the implementation of new technological tools, the profession has…

Read full story

5 Financial Considerations for Architecture and Engineering Firms

Working with walls, light, shadow and the properties of a nearly endless array of building materials, architects and engineers create the spaces in which we live and work. Some are…

Read full story

How to Increase Tax Savings with a Roth IRA-Owned IC-DISC

Did You Know Combining these Strategies Can Help You Save Even More Tax Dollars? Many business owners may already be aware of the very popular tax saving strategies that exist…

Read full story

Family-Owned Businesses: Succession Planning

In this episode of The Sound of Automation podcast, Frank Lashier III, COO of Dominion Technologies Group, Inc. joins us to talk about the challenges of transitioning a business within a…

Read full story

Clayton & McKervey Announces Appointment as Key Global Partner for the Centuro Global Network

Media Contact: Denise Asker, dasker@claytonmckervey.com; 248.936.9488 Southfield, Mich.—April 5, 2021—Clayton & McKervey, a certified public accounting and business advisory firm helping growth-driven companies compete in the global marketplace, is pleased…

Read full story

Categories

Jump directly to the topics that matter to you most.

  • A&E Professional Services
  • About Us
  • Advisory & Assurance
  • Business Owners
  • Careers
  • Client Accounting Services
  • Consulting
  • COVID-19
  • Data Analytics
  • From the President
  • Industrial Automation
  • International
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
  • Podcasts
  • Press Releases
  • Private Client Services
  • Tax & Tax Credits
  • Transaction Services
  • Videos

Authors

Read news direct from our managers and stakeholders.

  • Ben Smith
  • Beth Butchart
  • Bryan Powrozek
  • Carlos Calderon
  • Casey Haggerty
  • Clayton & McKervey
  • Dave Van Damme
  • Denise Asker
  • Eric Lin
  • Jim Biehl
  • Julie Killian
  • Kevin Johns
  • Margaret Amsden
  • Miroslav Georgiev
  • Nina Wang
  • Rob Dutkiewicz
  • Ruben Ramirez
  • Sarah Russell
  • Sue Tuson
  • Tarah Ablett
  • Teresa Gordon
  • Tim Finerty
  • Tim Hilligoss

Stay Connected

Here are some additional ways to stay connected.

  • Subscribe to our newsletter
  • View upcoming events
  • Contact us to learn more

Website

  • COVID-19
  • Insights
  • Who We Help
  • Services
  • Events
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe

Location

+1 248.208.8860
2000 Town Center
Suite 1800
Southfield, MI
48075 | USA

Connect

  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Client Login

Social

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Glassdoor
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Awards

DFP Top Work Places Best & Brightest
Prime Global

Tax | Accounting | Assurance | Consulting | Highly technical and accessible team of CPAs helping growth driven, closely held, middle market companies compete in the global marketplace. Michigan-based accountants and advisors focused on helping business owners in the United States and throughout Europe and China.

Privacy Policy Disclaimer

© 2021 Clayton & McKervey