Tax & Assurance Guidance

LLC Members Could Soon Be Subject to Self-Employment Tax

Posted on July 21, 2015 by

Margaret Amsden

Margaret Amsden

Share This

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Internal Revenue Code Section 1402(a) defines “net earnings from self-employment” as:

  • Gross income an individual receives from any trade or business, plus
  • An individual’s distributive share of income or loss from a partnership in which he or she is a partner, unless a specific exclusion applies.

Such an exclusion is located in IRC Section 1402(a)(13) which generally provides that the distributive share of partnership income or loss is excluded from the net earnings from self-employment if the partner receiving the distribution of income is a Limited Partner.

An issue has arisen due to the legal differences between the activities a Limited Liability Company member can perform versus those of a traditional Limited Partner.  The issue is further complicated because the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) and applicable Regulations did not, and still have not, defined the term Limited Partner.  In addition, the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 1976 provides that a Limited Partner would lose his limited liability protection if, in addition to the exercise of his rights and powers as a limited partner, he takes part in the control of the business which clearly differentiates an LLC member from a Limited Partner.

In recent action, the Internal Revenue Service issued a Chief Counsel Advice Memorandum (CCA 201436049) which determined that partners in a financial management company were not Limited Partners for purposes of self-employment tax because extensive services are being performed for the management company.

In the Memorandum, the management company, formed as a limited liability company, serves as the investment manager for two investment funds. Following are the facts of the case:

  • The funds are comprised of a family of investment partnerships that operate independently and pay quarterly management fees up to the investment manager.
  • The management company has full authority and responsibility to manage and control the affairs and business of each investment fund
  • The partners of the management company and its employees provide these services to the investment funds.
  • The primary source of revenue to the management company was the quarterly management fees charged to the funds.
  • Each of the partners in the management company receives a W-2 for yearly compensation, a guaranteed payment for health benefits and a pro-rata piece of the ordinary income generated from the receipt of management fees.

Based on these facts, the management company treated all of its partners as Limited Partners not subject to self-employment tax aside from the guaranteed payments for health benefits.

In the IRS’s view, the partners in the management company were taking control of the business as the partners. That is, they:

“perform extensive investment and operational management services for the partnership in their capacity as partners (i.e., acting in the manner of self-employed persons) and the management company derives its income from the investment management services performed by its partners.”

Based on this, the IRS concluded the partners are not limited partners for purposes of the exclusion under Section 1402(a)(13).

This Chief Counsel Advice further demonstrates the IRS’s desire to restrict the scope of the limited partner exemption in Section 1402(a)(13).

Margaret Amsden

Shareholder

Leading the firm’s private client services group, Margaret’s strategic & educational approach fosters a culture of learning among clients and colleagues.

Related Insights

Tax & Assurance Guidance

Foreign Tax Withholding: What You Need to Know

Posted on April 26, 2022 by

Rob Cheyne
Making service payments to a foreign person is a common cross-border transaction. U.S. taxpayers need to be aware of the applicability of withholding tax and related reporting requirements to ensure they comply and avoid unintended consequences. A U.S. payor must collect withholding tax and remit it to the IRS in the case it is applicable.

Tax & Assurance Guidance

SALT Relief for Partners and S Corps

Posted on February 23, 2022 by

Miroslav Georgiev
With small businesses supporting nearly 47% of U.S. employees, states have been advocating for pass-through entities, operating partnerships and S corporations that have been harshly impacted by the Tax Cuts and Job Act ‘s state and local taxes deduction limit. Recent legislative activity is finally providing relief for many of these businesses. 

Tax & Assurance Guidance

IRS Provides Relief on K-2 and K-3

Posted on February 17, 2022 by

Margaret Amsden
In an attempt to provide more transparency with regard to reporting of foreign activity and/or information to foreign owners, the IRS came out with two new forms: Schedule K-2 (an addendum to the Schedule K) and Schedule K-3 (an addendum to the Schedule K-1). Learn about the latest K-2 and K-3 reporting requirements issued by the IRS.

Sign up for our newsletters

Get general business and industry-specific news and knowledge straight from our accounting specialists.

The Sound of Automation Podcast

The Sound of Automation Podcast

Industrial automation businesses are the driving force behind Industry 4.0, and Clayton & McKervey is here to help.

Insights & Perspectives

The Sound of Automation: Looking ahead to CSIA 2022

In this episode we talk with Lisa Richter, Director of Industry Outreach and Growth at Control System Integrators Association (CSIA) . Lisa and Bryan look ahead to the CSIA Executive conference taking place in Denver, CO on June 27-30, 2022 and share with listeners what to expect, who will be there, and the discussion panel topics focusing on this years’ theme “The Future of Work”. 

Read More

The Sound of Automation Podcast

Industrial automation businesses are the driving force behind Industry 4.0, and Clayton & McKervey is here to help.

Skip to content