Tax & Assurance Guidance

Highlights of the Michigan Business Tax Replacement Act

Posted on June 9, 2011 by

Margaret Amsden

Margaret Amsden

Share This

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

On May 25, 2011, Governor Rick Snyder fulfilled his campaign promise to rid Michigan of the complicated Michigan Business Tax (MBT) by signing into law H.B. 4361; PA 38, and creating the Michigan Corporate Income Tax (CIT). Following is a summary of the impact of this new law on the business community.

Highlights of PA 38 Related to Corporate Income Tax (“CIT”)

  • PA 38 replaces the Michigan Business Tax Act effective January 1, 2012 and creates a CIT on “C” corporation business income at a rate of 6%. Business income is generally federal taxable income with some common adjustments including, but not limited to, the add back of bonus deprecation and domestic production deduction. It retains a small business credit, but eliminates most other credits available under the MBT.
  • Elimination of double taxation of pass-through entities by requiring only “C” corporations to pay CIT. Previously, owners of pass-through entities were taxed on business activity first via the MBT and a second time when paying tax at the individual level on their share of Michigan business income. By requiring only “C” corporations to pay the CIT, owners of pass-through entities will only be subject to one layer of tax at the individual level. This is true of both individual Michigan resident and non-resident owners.
  • Pass-through entities will be required to withhold Michigan Income Tax on the applicable share of Michigan source business income of non-resident individuals; “C” Corporations; and other pass-through entities that are members or partners.
  • Retains the unitary filing requirement rule for commonly controlled “C” corporations and provides that if the tax liability is less than $100, no return will be required.
  • Retains the MBT nexus standard for Domestic corporations:
    • Physical presence in Michigan for a period of one day during the tax year,
    • Active solicitation of sales in Michigan and gross receipts of $350,000 sourced to Michigan; or
    • A taxpayer with a beneficial ownership in a pass-through entity that has substantial nexus in Michigan.
      We believe there will be more to come on the issue of nexus. Public Law 86-272 prohibits a state from assessing an income tax when a taxpayer’s activities are limited to certain protected activities such as sales solicitation.
  • Retains the apportionment methodology of the MBT using a single factor formula based on sales.
  • Limits the previous MBT exclusion from filing that previously applied to all Foreign (non-U.S.) businesses that met certain requirements to limiting the exemption from CIT to businesses organized in NAFTA countries (Canada & Mexico) that meet certain requirements.
  • Businesses that received MEGA Credits will have to elect to continue to be taxed under the MBT in order to utilize credits.

Planning Thoughts

Domestic businesses that currently operate as a “C” corporation should review their operating structure to determine if it would be advantageous to reorganize as a pass-through entity. The CIT rate for a corporation is 6% while the tax rate for Michigan Individual income tax is 4.35%.

Foreign (Non-U.S./Non-NAFTA) Corporations should analyze the types of activities they are conducting in Michigan. Many foreign businesses have created subsidiaries based in Michigan. The parent companies of those subsidiaries generally send parent company employees into Michigan. It is important to understand the activities of those employees to ensure a Michigan tax filing responsibility isn’t created for the parent. There are planning opportunities for those foreign companies selling tangible personal property that is delivered to a Michigan customer. For example, PA 38 states that when calculating a Michigan tax base, foreign corporations would only include sales where title passes in the U.S. This would allow the foreign corporation the opportunity to structure transactions so that title passes outside the U.S. Service businesses have more complexity in structuring activities to avoid Michigan nexus.

Review MBT position for 2011 and maximize opportunities to reduce the gross receipts tax and take advantage of credits that will be eliminated in the future. For example, consider whether it would be beneficial to accelerate items that qualify as “purchases from other firms,” make sure industrial personal property taxes are paid, etc.

Business that have MEGA credits will have to review tax calculations under both the MBT and CIT to determine if they should elect to continue to be taxed under the MBT system to take advantage of credits.

More To Come

It is expected that there will be additional guidance forthcoming related to the new CIT as the Treasury begins implementation of the new tax.

Margaret Amsden

Shareholder

Leading the firm’s private client services group, Margaret’s strategic & educational approach fosters a culture of learning among clients and colleagues.

Related Insights

Tax & Assurance Guidance

Foreign Tax Withholding: What You Need to Know

Posted on April 26, 2022 by

Rob Cheyne
Making service payments to a foreign person is a common cross-border transaction. U.S. taxpayers need to be aware of the applicability of withholding tax and related reporting requirements to ensure they comply and avoid unintended consequences. A U.S. payor must collect withholding tax and remit it to the IRS in the case it is applicable.

Tax & Assurance Guidance

SALT Relief for Partners and S Corps

Posted on February 23, 2022 by

Miroslav Georgiev
With small businesses supporting nearly 47% of U.S. employees, states have been advocating for pass-through entities, operating partnerships and S corporations that have been harshly impacted by the Tax Cuts and Job Act ‘s state and local taxes deduction limit. Recent legislative activity is finally providing relief for many of these businesses. 

Tax & Assurance Guidance

IRS Provides Relief on K-2 and K-3

Posted on February 17, 2022 by

Margaret Amsden
In an attempt to provide more transparency with regard to reporting of foreign activity and/or information to foreign owners, the IRS came out with two new forms: Schedule K-2 (an addendum to the Schedule K) and Schedule K-3 (an addendum to the Schedule K-1). Learn about the latest K-2 and K-3 reporting requirements issued by the IRS.

Sign up for our newsletters

Get general business and industry-specific news and knowledge straight from our accounting specialists.

The Sound of Automation Podcast

The Sound of Automation Podcast

Industrial automation businesses are the driving force behind Industry 4.0, and Clayton & McKervey is here to help.

Insights & Perspectives

Data-driven decision making: 3 key insights for business owners

What does it take to build a data-driven business? For self-reliant leaders who feel they’ve hit a plateau when it comes to scaling a business, adopting a data-driven approach can be a breakthrough success strategy. Using data in a more focused way helps good engineers become good entrepreneurs. It’s about creating balance. Here we take a look at key insights for business owners when using data in decision making.

Read More

The Sound of Automation Podcast

Industrial automation businesses are the driving force behind Industry 4.0, and Clayton & McKervey is here to help.

Skip to content