• COVID-19
  • Insights
  • Who We Help
    •   Industrial Automation
    •   Manufacturing & Distribution
    •   A&E Professional Services
    •   International Businesses
      • ◦   Expanding Outside the U.S.
      • ◦   Expanding to the U.S.
  • Services
    •   COVID-19
      • ◦   Cash Flow Confidence Assessment
      • ◦   Maximize Your Loan Forgiveness
      • ◦   5 Key Focus Areas
      • ◦   COVID-19 Resource Center
    •   Client Accounting
      • ◦   Software Solutions
      • ◦   Accounting Support
      • ◦   Reporting
    •   Tax
      • ◦   R&D Tax Credit
      • ◦   Tax Credits & Incentives
      • ◦   Tax Structure
      • ◦   Federal Tax
      • ◦   State & Local Tax
      • ◦   Personal Tax
      • ◦   Other Tax Filings
    •   Advisory & Assurance
      • ◦   Assurance Levels
      • ◦   Reporting
      • ◦   Employee Benefit Plan Audits
      • ◦   Technical Accounting & Reporting
    •   Consulting
      • ◦   Data Analytics
      • ◦   Transaction Services
      • ◦   Business Planning
      • ◦   Succession & Exit Strategies
    •   International
      • ◦   International Tax
      • ◦   Foreign Direct Investment
      • ◦   Global Expansion
      • ◦   International Accounting
  • Events
  • Careers
    •   Why C&M
    •   Students
      • ◦   Campus Events
      • ◦   Internships
      • ◦   Reach Beyond Program
    •   Experienced Professionals
      • ◦   Team member profile videos
    •   Opportunities
    •   Employee Journals
    •   Office Tour
  • About Us
    •   How We Help
      • ◦   Service Approach
      • ◦   Affiliations
      • ◦   Communications & Technology
    •   Meet Our Team
    •   Testimonials
    •   Our Videos
    •   Our Story
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
CHANGE COUNTRY:
  • United States
  • 中国
  • Client Login
Clayton & McKervey Logo
  • COVID-19
  • Insights
  • Who We Help
  • Services
  • Events
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
    • Most Recent Insights
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. Common GAAP Violations for Manufacturers

Common GAAP Violations for Manufacturers

Posted by Kevin Johns on May 16, 2019

Kevin Johns Kevin Johns

Across the manufacturing sector, there is a great amount of diverse strategies, footprints, and segment approaches as they deal with artificial intelligence augmented reality, and the ever-increasing spread of robotics.  From an accounting standpoint, the one thing that often unites these companies together is GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), which provides the common language for companies to “speak” in regards to their financial performance.

In the United States, GAAP remains the most common accounting framework for the preparation of financial statements. This framework provides a common set of rules in order for readers to properly understand and interpret financial results.  GAAP is also the most common framework used when composing contract language for a merger or acquisition transaction.

Errors or omissions in applying GAAP can be costly in a business transaction; impacting credibility with lenders and leading to incorrect decisions. These violations can cause inaccurate reporting for internal and budgeting purposes, as well as a reduced reliance on prepared financial statements for third-party readers. Damaged credibility can furthermore cause a negative impact to the purchase price when going through a sale of the business.

Here’s a list of the five most common GAAP violations routinely uncovered when working with a new client. 

  1. Escalating Rent
    As a financial incentive, lessors quite often offer incentives in order to solicit a lessee into entering a rental contract. Many times these incentives can include “free rent” at either the beginning or the end of the lease arrangement. GAAP accounting requires that operating lease expenses be recognized on a straight-line basis – requiring lessees to divide the total rent payments over the lease term by the number of months in the lease to calculate monthly rent expense – unless a more rational basis is found. Any difference between payments and expenses would be classified as either a current or non-current asset or liability on the balance sheet.
  1. Depreciation
    As manufacturing companies continue their pursuit to the ideological industry 4.0, they are growing revenue through the addition of equipment upgrades and expansion. The tax code has helped fuel this expansion with providing generous tax write-offs through depreciation. With the passing of the most recent tax act, companies can now write off up to $1,000,000 through section 179, and the bonus depreciation laws are the best they have ever been. With this expanded tax depreciation write-offs, the spread between tax depreciation and book depreciation can be quite significant. These accelerated tax methods of depreciation do not comply with GAAP reporting rules, as outlined in FASB ASC Topic 740.In addition to accelerated depreciation, structural building improvements made to lease property would normally be depreciated over 39 years for tax purposes; however, GAAP stipulates that these improvements should be depreciated over the shorter of their useful life or the lease term, including renewable options that are expected to be exercised. It is common for businesses to incorrectly default to using the tax method of 39 years of depreciation for GAAP reporting for leasehold improvements.
  1. Capitalization of Overhead Costs
    A reporting requirement often overlooked is the capitalization of overhead. Many times only direct costs, such as labor and raw materials, are used to value the production of inventory. Overhead is typically either not associated or applied incorrectly to the basis of the value of inventory. The exclusion of overhead would be a departure from GAAP reporting.Overhead is based on variable and fixed factors, both of which are founded on actual usage drivers and formulas constructed by capacity vs. production for cost allocation. By not applying overhead calculations, large inventory valuation errors can occur on the balance sheet, and related cost of goods sold on the income statement.
  1. Accrued Vacation/PTO
    Finding and retaining talent continues to be a major hurdle for the manufacturing segment. In putting together an attractive compensation package, the employer wants to make sure their benefit package will be helpful in securing their workforce. One of the common benefits offered to employees is vacation time. The business, either through a formal written or informal (i.e. past practice, verbal agreement) policy, sets forth the requirements for employee participation. It is common for companies to have a “use it or lose it” policy in regards to vacation time. This type of policy dictates that should an employee not use their allocated vacation time during the year, the unused portion would be lost. However, there are many companies that will pay cash for unused vacation time at a certain point (i.e. anniversary date, specific calendar date, or upon separation from the company). A written formal plan in a human resource handbook does not by itself dictate a potential employer liability. Rather, a verbal and accepted policy is enough to trigger an employee’s potential right to compensation which might need to be accrued.Depending on the length of employee tenure and vacation time awarded, it is not uncommon that the liability associated with these policies can be significant. The impact is even more pronounced when a client is selling their business, and the buyer factors this liability into the required working capital target as well as the computing enterprise value, as a multiple of earnings.
  1. Uncertain Tax Positions
    FASB ASC Topic 740 established a threshold condition where a tax position taken in a previously filed tax return, or to be taken on future tax returns, be recognized currently in the financial statements. Uncertain tax positions must be recognized under a two-step process:

    1. A “more likely than not” (more than 50%) approach that a tax position will be sustained under an IRS audit
    2. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of tax benefit/expense that is greater than 50% likely

    The ability and ease to reach new markets outside of the businesses state of residence continue to propel businesses into new markets. Depending upon the nature and duration of the activity conducted outside of their home state, businesses could face an income tax liability in these states. If the company does not register to do business and does not register to file tax returns in these states, they would not preclude the GAAP financial statements from accruing the tax liability and disclosing it on the financial statements.

Other common tax uncertainties that need analysis include:

  • Business expenses (i.e. meals and entertainment, unreasonable compensation)
  • Valuation of deferred tax assets (i.e. net operating losses)
  • Transfer pricing between foreign related parties
  • Built-in gains tax (BIG) on conversion to an S-Corp
  • Pending IRS examinations
  • Framework for small and medium-sized entities (FRF for SMEs)

The majority of Clayton & McKervey clients are entrepreneurs who have started their own business and watched it succeed and grow.  For many of these clients, GAAP reporting can be cumbersome considering the complex guidance and potential limited resources.  For this qualified group, FRF for SMEs is a potential non GAAP reporting option.

FRF for SMEs was released in June of 2013 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) as an Other Comprehensive Basis of Accounting (OCBOA). This accounting framework is much more focused on cash flows, and relieves eligible companies of the unnecessary accounting burdens required by Fortune 500 companies, and driving GAAP pronouncements.  For example, uncertain tax positions, consolidation of certain Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), accounting for unrealized gains and losses in derivative contracts, and goodwill impairment testing would not be required under the FRF for SMEs framework.  Changes to GAAP for recent FASB pronouncements, such as accounting for leases and revenue recognition, would also be not applicable under this accounting framework.

Our team is always ready to help.

Please contact us for more information.

Kevin Johns

Kevin Johns

Shareholder, Engineering & Architecture

Contact Kevin   |   Read Kevin's bio

related news

IRS Issues New Guidance on PPP and Employee Retention Credit Eligibility

The IRS issued highly anticipated guidance regarding the employee retention credit (ERC) on March 1. We have previously outlined how the Consolidated Appropriations Act, passed in December, permitted employers receiving…

Read full story

Honoring International Women’s Day

In honor of International Women’s Day, I’d like to take a moment to recognize the talented women who have helped build our outstanding reputation within the business community – both…

Read full story

How to Calculate R&D Tax Credits

As we’ve seen in the first two installments of this series, business owners often miss out on the R&D tax credit opportunity and the bottom-line infusion it can provide. Many…

Read full story

Doing Business in Mexico: What to Expect this Year

Without a doubt, this year will be interesting for Mexico. To start, it’s an election year and we all know what that means…a lot of uncertainty. As the global pandemic…

Read full story

What Expenses Qualify for R&D Tax Credits?

The R&D tax credit is one of the most overlooked opportunities to boost your bottom line. Many business owners fail to claim it under the mistaken belief that they’re not…

Read full story

Categories

Jump directly to the topics that matter to you most.

  • A&E Professional Services
  • About Us
  • Advisory & Assurance
  • Business Owners
  • C&M Press Releases
  • Careers
  • China Consulting
  • Clayton & McKervey
  • Client Accounting Services
  • Consulting
  • COVID-19
  • Data Analytics
  • Estate Planning
  • Expanding Outside the U.S.
  • Expanding to the U.S.
  • From the President
  • Industrial Automation
  • International
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
  • Mexico Consulting
  • Podcasts
  • Private Client Services
  • Tax & Tax Credits
  • Transaction Services
  • Videos

Authors

Read news direct from our managers and stakeholders.

    • Ben Smith
    • Beth Butchart
    • Bryan Powrozek
    • Carlos Calderon
    • Casey Haggerty
    • Clayton & McKervey
    • Dave Van Damme
    • Denise Asker
    • Eric Lin
    • Jim Biehl
    • Julie Killian
    • Kevin Johns
    • Margaret Amsden
    • Miroslav Georgiev
    • Nina Wang
    • Rob Dutkiewicz
    • Ruben Ramirez
    • Sarah Russell
    • Sue Tuson
    • Tarah Ablett
    • Teresa Gordon
    • Tim Finerty
    • Tim Hilligoss
    • Wendy Reedy

Additional Resources

Additional news from Clayton & McKervey can be found below.

  • Subscribe to our email newsletter
  • View upcoming events
  • Contact us to let us know how we can help you
  • Main Content
  • Related Insights

Common GAAP Violations for Manufacturers

Posted by Kevin Johns on May 16, 2019

Kevin Johns

Across the manufacturing sector, there is a great amount of diverse strategies, footprints, and segment approaches as they deal with artificial intelligence augmented reality, and the ever-increasing spread of robotics.  From an accounting standpoint, the one thing that often unites these companies together is GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), which provides the common language for companies to “speak” in regards to their financial performance.

In the United States, GAAP remains the most common accounting framework for the preparation of financial statements. This framework provides a common set of rules in order for readers to properly understand and interpret financial results.  GAAP is also the most common framework used when composing contract language for a merger or acquisition transaction.

Errors or omissions in applying GAAP can be costly in a business transaction; impacting credibility with lenders and leading to incorrect decisions. These violations can cause inaccurate reporting for internal and budgeting purposes, as well as a reduced reliance on prepared financial statements for third-party readers. Damaged credibility can furthermore cause a negative impact to the purchase price when going through a sale of the business.

Here’s a list of the five most common GAAP violations routinely uncovered when working with a new client. 

  1. Escalating Rent
    As a financial incentive, lessors quite often offer incentives in order to solicit a lessee into entering a rental contract. Many times these incentives can include “free rent” at either the beginning or the end of the lease arrangement. GAAP accounting requires that operating lease expenses be recognized on a straight-line basis – requiring lessees to divide the total rent payments over the lease term by the number of months in the lease to calculate monthly rent expense – unless a more rational basis is found. Any difference between payments and expenses would be classified as either a current or non-current asset or liability on the balance sheet.
  1. Depreciation
    As manufacturing companies continue their pursuit to the ideological industry 4.0, they are growing revenue through the addition of equipment upgrades and expansion. The tax code has helped fuel this expansion with providing generous tax write-offs through depreciation. With the passing of the most recent tax act, companies can now write off up to $1,000,000 through section 179, and the bonus depreciation laws are the best they have ever been. With this expanded tax depreciation write-offs, the spread between tax depreciation and book depreciation can be quite significant. These accelerated tax methods of depreciation do not comply with GAAP reporting rules, as outlined in FASB ASC Topic 740.In addition to accelerated depreciation, structural building improvements made to lease property would normally be depreciated over 39 years for tax purposes; however, GAAP stipulates that these improvements should be depreciated over the shorter of their useful life or the lease term, including renewable options that are expected to be exercised. It is common for businesses to incorrectly default to using the tax method of 39 years of depreciation for GAAP reporting for leasehold improvements.
  1. Capitalization of Overhead Costs
    A reporting requirement often overlooked is the capitalization of overhead. Many times only direct costs, such as labor and raw materials, are used to value the production of inventory. Overhead is typically either not associated or applied incorrectly to the basis of the value of inventory. The exclusion of overhead would be a departure from GAAP reporting.Overhead is based on variable and fixed factors, both of which are founded on actual usage drivers and formulas constructed by capacity vs. production for cost allocation. By not applying overhead calculations, large inventory valuation errors can occur on the balance sheet, and related cost of goods sold on the income statement.
  1. Accrued Vacation/PTO
    Finding and retaining talent continues to be a major hurdle for the manufacturing segment. In putting together an attractive compensation package, the employer wants to make sure their benefit package will be helpful in securing their workforce. One of the common benefits offered to employees is vacation time. The business, either through a formal written or informal (i.e. past practice, verbal agreement) policy, sets forth the requirements for employee participation. It is common for companies to have a “use it or lose it” policy in regards to vacation time. This type of policy dictates that should an employee not use their allocated vacation time during the year, the unused portion would be lost. However, there are many companies that will pay cash for unused vacation time at a certain point (i.e. anniversary date, specific calendar date, or upon separation from the company). A written formal plan in a human resource handbook does not by itself dictate a potential employer liability. Rather, a verbal and accepted policy is enough to trigger an employee’s potential right to compensation which might need to be accrued.Depending on the length of employee tenure and vacation time awarded, it is not uncommon that the liability associated with these policies can be significant. The impact is even more pronounced when a client is selling their business, and the buyer factors this liability into the required working capital target as well as the computing enterprise value, as a multiple of earnings.
  1. Uncertain Tax Positions
    FASB ASC Topic 740 established a threshold condition where a tax position taken in a previously filed tax return, or to be taken on future tax returns, be recognized currently in the financial statements. Uncertain tax positions must be recognized under a two-step process:

    1. A “more likely than not” (more than 50%) approach that a tax position will be sustained under an IRS audit
    2. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of tax benefit/expense that is greater than 50% likely

    The ability and ease to reach new markets outside of the businesses state of residence continue to propel businesses into new markets. Depending upon the nature and duration of the activity conducted outside of their home state, businesses could face an income tax liability in these states. If the company does not register to do business and does not register to file tax returns in these states, they would not preclude the GAAP financial statements from accruing the tax liability and disclosing it on the financial statements.

Other common tax uncertainties that need analysis include:

  • Business expenses (i.e. meals and entertainment, unreasonable compensation)
  • Valuation of deferred tax assets (i.e. net operating losses)
  • Transfer pricing between foreign related parties
  • Built-in gains tax (BIG) on conversion to an S-Corp
  • Pending IRS examinations
  • Framework for small and medium-sized entities (FRF for SMEs)

The majority of Clayton & McKervey clients are entrepreneurs who have started their own business and watched it succeed and grow.  For many of these clients, GAAP reporting can be cumbersome considering the complex guidance and potential limited resources.  For this qualified group, FRF for SMEs is a potential non GAAP reporting option.

FRF for SMEs was released in June of 2013 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) as an Other Comprehensive Basis of Accounting (OCBOA). This accounting framework is much more focused on cash flows, and relieves eligible companies of the unnecessary accounting burdens required by Fortune 500 companies, and driving GAAP pronouncements.  For example, uncertain tax positions, consolidation of certain Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), accounting for unrealized gains and losses in derivative contracts, and goodwill impairment testing would not be required under the FRF for SMEs framework.  Changes to GAAP for recent FASB pronouncements, such as accounting for leases and revenue recognition, would also be not applicable under this accounting framework.

Our team is always ready to help.

Please contact us for more information.

Kevin Johns

Shareholder, Engineering & Architecture

Contact Kevin   |   Read Kevin's bio

related news

IRS Issues New Guidance on PPP and Employee Retention Credit Eligibility

The IRS issued highly anticipated guidance regarding the employee retention credit (ERC) on March 1. We have previously outlined how the Consolidated Appropriations Act, passed in December, permitted employers receiving…

Read full story

Honoring International Women’s Day

In honor of International Women’s Day, I’d like to take a moment to recognize the talented women who have helped build our outstanding reputation within the business community – both…

Read full story

How to Calculate R&D Tax Credits

As we’ve seen in the first two installments of this series, business owners often miss out on the R&D tax credit opportunity and the bottom-line infusion it can provide. Many…

Read full story

Doing Business in Mexico: What to Expect this Year

Without a doubt, this year will be interesting for Mexico. To start, it’s an election year and we all know what that means…a lot of uncertainty. As the global pandemic…

Read full story

What Expenses Qualify for R&D Tax Credits?

The R&D tax credit is one of the most overlooked opportunities to boost your bottom line. Many business owners fail to claim it under the mistaken belief that they’re not…

Read full story

Categories

Jump directly to the topics that matter to you most.

  • A&E Professional Services
  • About Us
  • Advisory & Assurance
  • Business Owners
  • C&M Press Releases
  • Careers
  • China Consulting
  • Clayton & McKervey
  • Client Accounting Services
  • Consulting
  • COVID-19
  • Data Analytics
  • Estate Planning
  • Expanding Outside the U.S.
  • Expanding to the U.S.
  • From the President
  • Industrial Automation
  • International
  • Manufacturing & Distribution
  • Mexico Consulting
  • Podcasts
  • Private Client Services
  • Tax & Tax Credits
  • Transaction Services
  • Videos

Authors

Read news direct from our managers and stakeholders.

  • Ben Smith
  • Beth Butchart
  • Bryan Powrozek
  • Carlos Calderon
  • Casey Haggerty
  • Clayton & McKervey
  • Dave Van Damme
  • Denise Asker
  • Eric Lin
  • Jim Biehl
  • Julie Killian
  • Kevin Johns
  • Margaret Amsden
  • Miroslav Georgiev
  • Nina Wang
  • Rob Dutkiewicz
  • Ruben Ramirez
  • Sarah Russell
  • Sue Tuson
  • Tarah Ablett
  • Teresa Gordon
  • Tim Finerty
  • Tim Hilligoss
  • Wendy Reedy

Additional Resources

Additional news from Clayton & McKervey can be found below.

  • Subscribe to our email newsletter
  • View upcoming events
  • Contact us to let us know how we can help you

Website

  • COVID-19
  • Insights
  • Who We Help
  • Services
  • Events
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe

Location

+1 248.208.8860
2000 Town Center
Suite 1800
Southfield, MI
48075 | USA

Connect

  • Events
  • Newsletter
  • Client Login

Social

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Glassdoor
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

Awards

DFP Top Work Places Best & Brightest
Prime Global

Tax | Accounting | Assurance | Consulting | Highly technical and accessible team of CPAs helping growth driven, closely held, middle market companies compete in the global marketplace. Michigan-based accountants and advisors focused on helping business owners in the United States and throughout Europe and China.

Privacy Policy Disclaimer

© 2021 Clayton & McKervey